Big Fry no Crunchie

Picturehead from , 6th September, 2009

Within twenty minutes my 20yr old son and I were yawning in complete boredom for something to happen. Nothing of any Bond-like consequence does. Perhaps this is why the producers included some cameo teasers of the previous outstanding Bond films in the opening credits, Diana Rigg is surprisingly unengaging and George Lazenby (Big Fry) should have stuck to chocolate advertising but look out for an early Joanna Lumley as 'one of the girls' and the Satchmo song is a winner.

OHMSS

A Customer from Stoke-on-Trent, 3rd September, 2009

I love me Bond films - watch em all like I have!!!

Best Bond

GaryI from , 3rd July, 2009

Arguably this is the best Bond film....why? well its a true spy film, it has a great plot with loads of twists and turns, it is a classic Bond story, few gadgets and those that are used are v practical not stupid childish things like laser watches , invisible cars etc. You maybe put off by Lazenby, and yes he is not a thespian but he could have gone on to do wonderful things with the character. If you read he couldn't act then watch the last sad scene, he really nails it. I have to admit this is my favouriute Bond movie and if you look at casino Royale for example you will see 'On Her Majestys...' is in that style of 30 years ago. Watch this with an open mind, forget the Roger Moore/Pierce Brosnan additions and you may find a very enjoyable, action packed, spy thriller .

*** May contain spoilers ***

a great bond movie

A Customer from Hartlepool, 9th January, 2009

one of the best bond films ever !!! my boyfriend a real bond fan and he says besides casino royale it the best bond film its just a pity Sean Connery wasnt bond then he would say it was the best bond film he seen to date but he says Dainel Craig is a brilliant bond second only to Connery ohmss has the best story line in any bond film though i thought that George Lazenby was a good bond considering he only played him once i think he aleast deserved one more outing as the worlds most famous spy but the rest of cast where brilliant over all a great movie its just a pity that most people just compaire Lazenby to Connery with isnt fair because most people see connery as the first and best bond witch is something that Dainel Craig and any other actor who plays bond will have to face

not the best

A Customer from Basildon, 2nd January, 2009

i can see why they only made one film with George Lazenby. Don't bother

James Bond and the Essence of the 60's Captured....

A Customer from Southampton, 28th November, 2008

This is a 'quintessential' bond movie that captures the is-ness of 60's cinema at the end of arguably one of the most important decades in cinematic history. George Lazenby is on par with Connery and watching this one can only lament that, due to his agents persistence, he did not continue as our 007. It has Great Britain right through it as a stick of Blackpool rock. Diana Rigg is, as expected, classy, emancipated and gorgeous with a capital 'G'. Savalas is truly memorable in what I consider the best interpretation of Blowfelds' incarnations.Featuring high octane action, a bevvy of beauties, one of the best Bond soundtracks and psychedelically hung-over visuals it is, without doubt, the most seriously underrated of Bonds escapades. After witnessing the tepid 'Quantum of Solace' the people behind the new Bond franchise should study this and take heed on how a Bond film needs to be and what vital ingredients are needed for a triumph rather than a slight tragedy!

George Lazenby - A Dis-service to James Bond

A Customer from London, 22nd October, 2008

A pity - despite this being one of Ian Fleming's best stories, co-starring the magnificent Dianna Rigg as Bond's true love 'Tracy', the film is hampered by the limited and charisma free performanc by the one-time, one dimensional George Lazenby's performance as Bond. Everything else, (Telly Savalas as Bloefeld, sets, actions sequences etc) are otherwise up to the standard that has kept this series running for 45 years and 22 movies. Imagine what Sean Connery, or especially Pierce Brosnan (whose a better all-round actor) could have made of this, especially in the final scene! Still, well worth seeing.

on her majestys secret service

ricky from , 6th September, 2008

very good typical 007 well worth watching

1 out of 2 people found the following review helpful:

Customer Review

A Customer from UK, 23rd June, 2008

Boring.

I cannot believe that a Bond film could be so bad. It was so slow moving that I was hoping that the end would come 30 mins before it did.

not bad

gaz115 from from Stoke-On-Trent, 7th May, 2008

I know this is quite old bond film ,but it was one i had never seen before. It wasnt bad bit dated but still ok . Never knew about the ending of the film, bit shocked. George Lazenby didnt make a bad bond and probably should of had another go at it.