11 out of 12 people found the following review helpful:

Gripping political thriller, slightly marred by confusing ending
wreeve from from London NW3,
26th April, 2009
From the opening scene - reminiscent of a Bond movie - it is clear that this is a well-told political drama. The story-telling is crisp, the performances are robust, and the production values are rich and deep. Russell Crowe excels as an overweight luddite old-school journalist, with clear (lack of?) professional standards. They don't make them like this any more, is the subtext, with constant derogatory references to the new media journalism of blogging. The new media journalism world is represented by Rachel McAdams, a pretty young intern brought in to write the newspaper's daily gossip column. She still has her ideals tho and they prove important as she finds herself immersed in the increasingly high stakes story that takes centre stage. The explosive story that the two journalists uncover revolves around an important congressman who, would you believe it, was Crowe's college room-mate, and whose assistant meets an untimely end. Bizarre love triangles (?) and defence industry conspiracies both feature prominently. Helen Mirren and Robin Wright Penn both do a decent job in support. Mirren is the newspaper's editor, a basically decent old-school type under pressure from the new owner (and those nasty new media competitors). Merryl Streep comes to mind, which doesn't do Mirren any favours. Penn bears no such comparison as the congressman's wife (and then some). The story is very well told, right up to the denouement. A great climax would have made this a 4.5/5 star film but in fact I felt the ending left a disappointing taste in my mouth and I was wondering about 3.5*. In the end tho I give it 4. It's certainly a good night's viewing and Russell Crowe proves again that he can carry a movie in a very wide range of roles.