Skip over navigation

Sofa Cinema

Gifts - NEW  |   Help   |   Sign in

Tales From Earthsea (2006) Certificate PG

Tales From Earthsea

Sign up

Rated 3.0 stars
Average rating
(61%)
 
Starring: Junichi Okada | Aoi Teshima | Bunta Sugawara | Yuko Tanaka | Teruyuki Kagawa
Director: Goro Miyazaki
Studio: OPTIMUM RELEASING
Run time: 115 mins
Genres: Animated | Anime | Sci-Fi/Fantasy
Languages: Japanese
Dubbed: English
Subtitles: English
Released: January 28, 2008

Based on Ursula LeGuin's "Earthsea" books, this is the first film from the son of the legendary Hayao Miyazaki. While investigating a number of strange occurences, along with a rise in dragon sightings, the wizard Ged meets the prince Arren. But little does he realise the darkness dwelling inside the prince and what he is capable of.

Rating of 3 stars out of 5
Time Out

The latest from Studio Ghibli is a mini epic by Goro (son of Hayao) Miyazaki adapted from the work of Ursula K Le Guin....

Highest rated reviews

29 out of 30 people found the following review helpful:

Rated 2.0 stars
Tales from Earthsea

CJH from , 8th September, 2007

I enjoy Studio Ghibli films, and I liked Le Guins Earthsea books, but I found this film was sorely lacking in both areas. The books do have a wandering pace, and perhaps that doesn't translate into film that well, but the characters weren't this wooden. Scenes crawled by with rather clumsy animation - for Ghibli - and almost no explaination of anything; just when a revelation is to be revealed, it is cut and we are left with no answers and a lot more agriculture. Most of it felt like, Ah, this is actually kinda scary and threatening, what are the characters going to do now? Oh never mind, we have more ploughing to do... Even the heart-felt song mid-way through felt torturously long and tedious. If you love Ghibli, you'll probably get something from it, but the animation is not up to their standards. If you love Earthsea and Sparrowhawk, I suggest you leave it alone. There are flashes of the book's intentions and 'I remember when this happened' moments (which speak more like 'this is based on a book you know') not to mention Sparrowhawk himself does virtually nothing. I hope one day someone makes a proper rendition of Ursula's books, this and the sci-fi channel's poor attempt just use and abuse them. Either that or she just stops giving people the rights to them.

Read all highest rated reviews

11 out of 13 people found the following review helpful:

Rated 3.0 stars
Average

A Customer from Leeds, UK, 5th August, 2007

As far as Ghibli goes, this is a let-down. It's not a bad film, it's just terribly uneventful and really lacks the quirky characters of their other works. Some of it really made no sense either, and reading online, the books the movie is based on are just as baffling over some issues. Worth a watch, but won't get repeat viewings.

Read all highest rated reviews

7 out of 7 people found the following review helpful:

Rated 4.0 stars
Better than I expected

A Customer from Cambridge, 1st February, 2008

Reading other reviews I expected this to be way below par, compared to other Studio Ghibli films. But I did enjoy it, and I think the reason it received (other) low ratings was partly because it was attempting to render a synthesis of the 'Earthsea' stories, while not having the freedom of expression you will find in other Ghibli productions. It does try to convey the characters and the world of Earthsea; and that may be why it is a bit slow. But (any faults apart) it was quite an enjoyable film and deserved a better reception. Hey, lets get a bit real here; any Ghibli offering, while not at the top of their league, is way ahead of the usual Hollywood Pap!

Read all highest rated reviews

6 out of 7 people found the following review helpful:

Rated 1.0 stars
Poorest Ghibli in recent memory

Drschrebling from from Harrow, 20th May, 2008

Following in the footsteps of Spirited Away and Howl's Moving Castle was never going to be easy, but I was really disappointed The story telling feels laboured and the animation feels about three decades old. There are few redeeming features, this is one best forgotten!

Read all highest rated reviews

Most recent reviews

Rated 3.0 stars
Slow start, exceptional ending

sonicyouth789 from from London, 28th January, 2010

Before I watched this film, I read a lot of reviews slating it, a first to be directed by Goro Miyazaki, son of legendary animator Hayao Miyazaki. For me this was a brilliant debut by someone saddled with his father's immense reputation. I must admit the beginning was very slow, but you could forgive its slow pace due to the stunning art work on show. Some of the landscapes shone with a special water colour beauty. The end sequence was simply stunning. Without giving away any of the plot, this film is well worth a look by fans of studio Ghibli films, and fans who like their fairytales awash with equal amounts of despair and wonderment.

Read all recent reviews

Rated 2.0 stars
Tales from Earthsea

eoinsda from , 26th January, 2010

Long drawn out and overly long, kids got bored very quickly.

Read all recent reviews

Rated 2.0 stars
disapointing

calladineapel from , 14th October, 2009

Not the normal standard from the ghibli studios. ok to pass some time by.

Read all recent reviews

*** May contain spoilers ***


Rated 0.0 stars
Fan of the books? Then dont watch this.

A Customer from Aldershot, 18th August, 2009

As far as Studio Ghibli films go, this is by no means the worst, but if you liked the Earthsea books, you are in for a huge disappointment. Music: Some of the music was actually pretty good in this, especially during some of the landscape scenes where there was a nice sense of mystery while still achieving the “epic” feel that you would get in the Lord of the Rings films. I didn’t particularly like Therru’s song, in fact that entire scene was pretty pointless. The lyrics were kind of lame, and they seemed to forget that since Therru was burned as a child her voice was extremely husky. Scenery/Animation: No complaints here, the animation was quite nice throughout. A lot of the shots of the landscape and sky were stunning and looked how I imagined Earthsea should – while still managing to convey the Japanese style that you see in similar films. Storyline/Characters (spoilers here): Ok, this is where the film fails, BIG TIME! Now Studio Ghibli films aren’t exactly renowned for their ingenious plots, but considering how fantastic the books were I am stunned at how they managed to mess this up. Basically the film roughly follows the storyline of the third book, The Farthest Shore, but contains elements of all 4 books, and ends up trying to cram way too many ideas into one film; the result is that no elements of the plot are fully explained, developed or resolved in any way. For example, rather than Arren being sent to Roke by his father to seek advice from the mages and Ged, the film starts with Arren murdering his father and running away, then coming across Ged later by chance. Later you find out that Arren has some sort of dark shadow following him, making him do evil things etc. This is basically the story of the first book, except that the shadow is following Arren, not Ged, and not because he did some evil to release the shadow on the world, but for no reason at all. You see the shadow later in the film, it takes Arren’s form like the Gebbeth in the Wizard of Earthsea. Secondly, the dreams that Arren has serve little purpose in the film, since he and Ged never follow Cob into the dry land, there is never any reference to Arren leading Ged back from that place, or that the one who walks through that land would be King, or of Ged losing his power. Worse than that, Cob is trivialized into a cliché villain, with minions who go round threatening villagers etc. while at the same time draining the power from Earthsea. Oh, and you'll recognize the 'black slime' - Same as in Spirited Away, Princess Mononoke etc. any demon or evil villian/being just turns into black slime towards the end of the film. No reason, i guess they just think its fun to animate or something! Then there are countless and unexplained references to the meaning of life and death and the equilibrium, the wisdom of wizards etc. in an attempt to justify the patchy storyline. Unfortunately I cannot talk about the “guest appearences” from Tenar and Therru (except that they have no relevance apart from the provide an interlude in which Ged and Arren do some farming) because I don’t have enough words left.

Read all recent reviews