14 out of 15 people found the following review helpful:

10 minutes wasted

tedrodgers321 from Tyne/Wear, 30th December, 2005

The worst 10 minutes of film I have ever had the misfortune to see. Sat in amazement at the acting skills of total novices literally embarrassing themselves on screen.

Read all highest rated reviews

6 out of 6 people found the following review helpful:

What a Waste!!!!

brawn279 from West Midlands, 10th January, 2006

The movie itself is BAD!!!!!.....I thought I'll just continuing watching hoping it will get better and at the same time there might be a good looking babe lurking in the cast but was WRONG!!!!!! Not worth watching. Anybody could make a better film.

Read all highest rated reviews

6 out of 9 people found the following review helpful:

CRAP AND THEN MORE CRAP

peter rumsey from LEEDS, 12th July, 2006

DONT TOUCH WITH A BARGE POLE

Read all highest rated reviews

5 out of 5 people found the following review helpful:

100% Waste Of Time

BCLSLM from Nottinghamshire, 19th January, 2006

I don't know what they were thinking when they made this movie as it is a total waste of time watching. I like a movie with a good plot but they had forgotten to put a plot in this film from start to finish and the acting was terrible but having watched it they couldn't have acted any better with this film.

Take my word for it, don't bother watching this as you would be better watching paint dry

Read all highest rated reviews

1 out of 1 people found the following review helpful:

This is a terrible film!!!!!!!!

CyrusTheVirus from from Pontyclun, 16th September, 2008

I think this film top's the long list of the worst films that I have ever seen. The only reason that I started watching it was because Tom Savini was in it, why, I do not know!!!!!!!! Maybe he felt sorry for them. The acting was awfull, they could'nt have been more wooden if they tried, i'm sure if someone gave me a video camera and Tom Savini I could make something much better than this crap.

Read all recent reviews

Avoid

dfxdx from , 6th March, 2008

Writing a review for this film merely puts words to the feelings that you will experience when watching this film and unfortunately, they are not very nice words. At times you may be feeling rebellious and refuse to listen to others (other reviews) or ignore the shabby cover in an attempt to look for the diamond in the rough - my advice is to look elsewhere since you will not find it here. The acting is so bad it is superbad or hyperbad - choose a superlative and just make sure it goes before 'bad'. Or maybe I am wrong - the acting is not bad - it is not there. I feel the need to justify why I even watched it: call it a benchmarking exercise, a skeleton in the closet or a error in judgement. OK the truth - I like Shaun Hutson as an author and I saw that he was in the film. If my advice is worth anything after this embarrasing choice - stick to his books.

Read all recent reviews

1 out of 1 people found the following review helpful:

Not as bad as I was led to believe

Pete14 from , 25th November, 2007

Every Director has to start from somewhere. Sam Raimi and Peter Jackson started on a shoe string budget and are now both at the top of the game. This movie had its faults but it was really not as bad as I thought it would be judging from some of the reviews. Roberts should take heart from this and go onto better projects. Not the best but certainly no where near the worst.

Read all recent reviews

3 out of 3 people found the following review helpful:

Awful

A Customer from York, 15th July, 2007

This is the worst film I have ever seen. I find it amazing that it is actually available to rent. It looks like something a couple of students shot on a home video camera as a joke. I have created better special effects at home using win xp movie maker! Please don't waste 2 hrs of your life watching this utter trash.

Read all recent reviews