Skip over navigation

Sofa Cinema

Gifts - NEW  |   Help   |   Sign in

Lolita (1962) Certificate 15

Lolita

Sign up

Rated 3.5 stars
Average rating
(66%)
 
Starring: James Mason | Shelley Winters | Sue Lyon | Gary Cockrell | Diana Decker | Lois Maxwell
Director: Stanley Kubrick
Studio: WARNER HOME VIDEO
Run time: 147 mins
Genres: Drama
Languages: English
Dubbed: French, Italian
Hearing-impaired: English, Italian
Subtitles: Arabic, Bulgarian, Dutch, English, French, German, Italian, Portuguese, Romanian, Spanish
Released: September 10, 2001

How did they make a movie out of Lolita? teased the print ads of this Stanley Kubrick production. The answer: by adding three years to the title character's age. The original Vladimir Nabokov novel caused no end of scandal by detailing the romance between a middle-aged intellectual and a 12-year-old nymphet. The affair is cleansed ever so slightly in the film by making Lolita a 15-year-old (portrayed by 16-year-old Sue Lyon). In adapting his novel to film, Nabokov downplayed the wicked satire and sensuality of the material, concentrating instead on the story's farcical aspects. James Mason plays professor Humbert Humbert, who while waiting to begin a teaching post in the United States rents a room from blowzy Shelley Winters. Winters immediately falls for the worldly Humbert, but he only has eyes for his landlady's nubile daughter Lolita. The professor goes so far as to marry Winters so that he can remain near to the object of his ardor. Turning up like a bad penny at every opportunity is smarmy TV writer Quilty (Peter Sellers), who seems inordinately interested in Humbert's behavior. When Winters happens to read Humbert's diary, she is so revolted by his lustful thoughts that she runs blindly into the street, where she is struck and killed by a car. Without telling Lolita that her mother is dead, Humbert packs her into the car and goes on a cross-country trip, dogged every inch of the way by a mysterious pursuer. Once she gets over the shock of her mother's death, Lolita is agreeable to inaugurating an affair with her stepfather (this is handled very, very discreetly, despite the slavering critical assessments of 1962). But when the girl begins discovering boys her own age, she drifts away from Humbert. One day, she leaves without warning. This is humiliation enough for Humbert; but when he discovers who her secret lover really is, the results are fatal. We are prepared for the ending because the film has been framed as a flashback; what we are not prepared for is Stanley Kubrick's adroit manipulation of our sympathies and expectations. An incredibly long film considering its subject matter, Lolita is never dull, nor does it ever stoop to the sensationalism prevalent in the film's ad campaign.~ Hal Erickson, All Movie Guide

Rating of 5 stars out of 5
Radio Times

“How did they ever make a film of Lolita?” asked the posters for this brilliant Stanley Kubrick film. Well, in Vladimir Nabokov's adaptation of his own famous novel about the professor and the 12-year-old girl, there are added layers of black comedy and only slight compromise: James Mason seems to love Sue Lyon rather than lust after her, and Lolita's age is increased to 15. As time goes by, Lolita gets better and funnier. Shelley Winters's hilarious and sad portrayal of Lolita's mother is American momism incarnate, while Peter Sellers as Clare Quilty is like a creepy chameleon. Only one quibble: for economic and censorship reasons the picture was made in England, and because of this Nabokov's nightmare vision of urban America and its seedy motels is reduced to obvious back projection and even more obvious Elstree locations. This apart, a perfect movie that gets better as time goes by.

Highest rated reviews

20 out of 24 people found the following review helpful:

Rated 1.0 stars
Oh Dear!

A Customer from Glasgow, 17th May, 2006

Oh dear! What an awful film! first of all, its in black and white, the acting is terrible & the characters totally unconvincing - in fact, my boyfriend and I turned it off after 30 gruelling minutes. I love the book Lolita, its a work of art and I really enjoyed the Adrian Lyne version of film with Jeremy Irons, Melanie Griffith & Dominique Swain who is just PERFECT for the part. Honestly, dont even bother with this, if you have read the book then the Adrian Lyne version will satisfy you. They couldnt have picked a better actress to play Lolita

Read all highest rated reviews

9 out of 10 people found the following review helpful:

Rated 2.0 stars
Very boring

A Customer from Northants, 19th November, 2005

I was expecting a very different film to this. I was bored to tears waiting for some action. Why others found it good I will never understand

Read all highest rated reviews

6 out of 6 people found the following review helpful:

Rated 4.0 stars
lolita

jones from from Southampton, 10th April, 2008

An old englishman that falls madly in love with a young teenager. unbeknown to this teenage crush the girls mother falls madly in love with the old englishman, and then peter sellers a rich unusual novelist snatches the girl. good yeah.. Arse!

Read all highest rated reviews

5 out of 5 people found the following review helpful:

Rated 4.0 stars
Very funny, dark and desperate

Daniel Pollard from Manchester, England, 7th August, 2009

Stanley Kubrick film adaptation from 1960, starring James Mason and Peter Sellers. The marketing campaign and the original theatrical trailer both state it’s a miracle the film got made. After watching Lolita, I can see why. It’s about James Mason’s infatuation and subsequent love affair with his underage step daughter, Lolita, played by newcomer Sue Lyon. Because of the attitudes at the time, and even still today, Mason and Lyon are never shown consummating their love, or even showing any physical affection for each other. Because of this, it’s not entirely clear the nature of their relationship, however, this ambivalence lends itself to the film. This sounds like a dark picture with some quite nasty themes; however, it is more of a comedy, especially the first half. The second, although full of laughs, does get darker and more desperate. The scene that really stayed with me was when James Mason refuses the advances of his landlady, played brilliantly by Shelly Winters; she then drifts into a monologue about loneliness and desperation, which she shouts at the top of her voice. Very powerful and compelling viewing. My only problem with this great film is Peter Sellers, a playwright who is also infatuated with Lolita. Kubrick seems to have given him too much freedom. His performance is way too over the top and would have benefited from Kubrick reining him in.

Read all highest rated reviews

Most recent reviews

Rated 2.0 stars
Go for the Adrian Lyne adaption rather than this.

Sean Sansom from Wrexham, 10th May, 2009

I was expecting a far more engaging film than this; It's pretty sedate and uninspired, having the feeling of early 'Rom-Com' about it for the bulk of the film- which is completely out of keeping with Nabokov's book, despite its humour. Also, it's far too easy to sympathise with Humbert (-possibly in keeping with Polanski's own well publicised predilections) and Lo is clearly about 20 making for a quite sanitised version with no elements of disquiet. The neurotic pitch of Humbert's love isn't shown well, the effects of his actions go unnoticed, there is no attempt to address hypocrisy in the viewer or society and there is no back story for Humbert. Some of this may be forgivable given the times the film was made in, but it is still a bad, uncomfortably viewable and cowardly adaption. Overall pretty dull, overly long (given the dullness) and a shallow baftardisation of the original work. I loved 'Chinatown' so I'm not against Polanski as a director but the later Adrian Lyne adaption with Jeremy Irons is a far better film. The missis thought it was rubbish too.

Read all recent reviews