Skip over navigation

Sofa Cinema

Gifts - NEW  |   Help   |   Sign in

A Clockwork Orange (1971) Certificate 18

A Clockwork Orange
Play trailer

Sign up

Rated 3.5 stars
Average rating
(67%)
 
Starring: Malcolm McDowell | Patrick Magee | Michael Bates | Warren Clarke | Adrienne Corri | Miriam Karlin | David Prowse | John Savident
Director: Stanley Kubrick
Studio: WARNER HOME VIDEO
Run time: 131 mins
Genres: Drama
Languages: English
Subtitles: English
Released: September 10, 2001

From its opening shot of Malcolm McDowell staring with evil intent directly into the camera (which pulls back to reveal him drinking a glass of milk), Stanley Kubrick's brilliant CLOCKWORK ORANGE announces itself as a completely new kind of viewing experience. Banned in Britain for decades, the film, set in an unidentified future, overwhelms the senses with its almost comic depictions of rape and violence set to an upbeat classical and pop music score; its magnificent, colorful, futuristic set designs; and its utter determination to shock, frighten, and thoroughly entertain its audience. Kubrick based his chilling masterpiece on Anthony Burgess's culture-shaking novel about a young man, growing into adulthood, who has a bit of a problem with authority figures. (Interestingly, Burgess's stunning piece of fiction contains 21 chapters, but Kubrick ends his film after chapter 20.) When Alex (a career-defining performance by McDowell) and his droogs go out for a little bit of the old ultraviolence, he is caught and forced to undergo controversial treatment that will make it impossible for him to commit violent acts--but has severe side effects. Kubrick's film purposely confuses crime and punishment, cause and effect, hero and villain, irony and satire, filled with oxymoron and paradox, taking on science, politics, societal mores, education, sexual awakening, and parental responsibility all in a new language (both verbal and visual) that would change the cinema forever. No one who has seen it has ever been able to hear "Singin' in the Rain" or Ludwig van again in quite the same way.

Screenshots

Rating of 3 stars out of 5
Radio Times

Unseen between 1974 (when Stanley Kubrick himself quietly withdrew it) and 2000 (after his death), it is little wonder that an inflated degree of mythology surrounds this notorious futuristic drama. Dramatised from the 1962 Anthony Burgess novella about anarchic yobs (“droogs”) in a dystopian future, it was shocking then and it's shocking today, particularly the scenes of rape and sadistic “ultraviolence” in the first half. Burgess and Kubrick may have been making intellectual points about the state and free will — Alex (Malcolm McDowell) is brainwashed into submission in the film's more ponderous second half — but the film doesn't quite live up to the masterpiece status that unattainability has bestowed on it. Fascinating and prescient, yes, and its moral ambiguity is brave, but it's really only essential viewing for cineastes and film students.

Rating of 3 stars out of 5
Halliwell's Film Guide

Kubrick's fantastic meditation on a violent future has seemed more prescient with every passing year. In extraordinary images of clown-like delinquents, he orchestrates to electronic music mindless street violence, which leads to mindful state violence a

Highest rated reviews

28 out of 34 people found the following review helpful:

Rated 5.0 stars
Ultra violent & high impact, despite its age

A Customer from Harleston, Norfolk, 15th September, 2003

Beethoven's 9th (or is it 5th?) will never sound quite the same again after this film. Futuristic thuggish violence, including some blood-curdling sexual assaults, in an utterly surreal setting. Showing its age - well pre mobile phones - this film nonetheless shows you how differently you can portray the future from Sleepers or Minority Report. The film was banned for years but is nonetheless (accordingly?) a cult classic - and deservedly so.

Read all highest rated reviews

26 out of 32 people found the following review helpful:

Rated 0.0 stars
WHAT A LOAD OF CRAP

A Customer from skegness, 23rd November, 2007

I WATCHED THIS FILM IN THE EARLY EIGHTIES ON PIRATE VIDEO WHEN IT WAS STILL BANNED, I EXPECTED THIS FILM TO TO BE GORY AND GROSS BEING BANNED FOR MANY YEARS AND WAS NOT SUPRISED TO FIND THIS FILM WAS TOTAL RUBBISH , ANYBODY WHO FINDS THIS FILM GOOD IS IS ONE VERY SAD PERSON, AS ARE MANY FILM CRITICS WHO SEEM TO FEED ON THIS RUBBISH, MAYBE IM JUST A SAD GIT WHO ENJOYS FILMS WITHOUT DEEP MEANIG THAT ARE ENTERTAINIG AND FUN. LONG THE TRUE BRIT FILM NOT THIS CRAP.

Read all highest rated reviews

20 out of 23 people found the following review helpful:

Rated 5.0 stars
What is it with TO reviewers and Kubrick?

rostokov from london, 13th January, 2005

'A sexless, inhuman film, whose power derives from a ruthless subordination of its content to the demands of telling a good story.' This is a nonsensical criticism. I thought good storytelling was a laudable ideal. The film doesn't really even subordinate its content, ie: Burgess' novel, it is a remarkably lucid adaptation, masterfully transforming Burgess' poetic prose into a cinematic symphony riffing on the theme of individual free will V's society.

It is only 'inhuman' if one is willing to believe that the primal urges its protagonist displays aren't human impulses, for good or bad. It is not my favourite Kubrick film, (I find the ending a little inadequate), but its still a powerful film that demands to be seen.

Read all highest rated reviews

14 out of 17 people found the following review helpful:

Rated 5.0 stars
Outstanding

DryIce from Cambridgeshire, 18th October, 2003

This film is definitely not for everyone. I truly believe it's one of those 'love it or hate it' creations, and being a Kubrick film that's not entirely surprising. It carries on a bit, it isn't easy watching by any means, but by God! it paints a vivid picture.
This film wasn't banned: it was withdrawn by Kubrick himself due to copycat killings shortly after its 1971 release. 'A Clockwork Orange' is more shocking than violent, about a young man and his chums who get high in the most languidly mellow bar you've ever seen, and go about driving fast and committing sexual offenses. Essentially it's about bored teenagers in 70's England who get their kicks in varied ways, and unlike many allegedly shocking films of past decades [The Exorcist, Texas Chainsaw Massacre etc], this one still hits hard, still touches a raw nerve, still makes you think.
It's elaborate, it's outrageous, and the 'Singing in the Rain' scene is one of the most memorable in cinema history.
Like I said, it's not everyone's cup of tea, but this will certainly invigorate you, and open your eyes wide.

Read all highest rated reviews

Most recent reviews

Rated 2.0 stars
So overrated!

Bellos from , 19th March, 2010

People go on and on about how amazing this film is. Quite frankly i feel it is so overrated and to be honest i was really bored at times. The idea is interesting and the film makes an interesting point about choice and morality, but a film needs to do more than that. It needs to hold your attention and make you feel something about the characters; good or bad. I just didnt care enough about anything in the film. I think alot of people rave about it because they think it's cool and therefore they think they are cool for liking it.

Read all recent reviews

Rated 1.0 stars
A Clockwork Orange

A Customer from Newtown, 14th March, 2010

I hated this film, it was mindless sexual and aggressive violence from the very outset. Some may see its artistic qualitities but I would warn potential sensitive viewers to beware as scenes of rape can be extrememly offensive and disturbing. Really not my cup of tea.

Read all recent reviews

Rated 0.0 stars
Disappointed

Taichi from , 31st January, 2010

I put this into the DVD player expecting something iconic and brilliant. What I got was a disappointing evening which, when I got to the second half of the film, I ended up fast forwarding to get to the end. I don't do that very often... Yes it was shocking (and would have been even more in its time) but it was a shallow, pathetic, uber-violence, sad, overly dramatic film with painful dialogue and it never really engaged me on any level. Oh well at least I didn't have to pay to see it at the cinema...

Read all recent reviews

Rated 1.0 stars
Weird, Weird & weirder

A Customer from Torquay, 7th November, 2009

Heard a lot about this film but as never seen, hired 2 c what the fuss was about. Weird, couldn't watch it just gastly.

Read all recent reviews