Skip over navigation

Sofa Cinema

Gifts - NEW  |   Help   |   Sign in

Closer (2004) Certificate 15

Closer
Play trailer

Sign up

Rated 3.0 stars
Average rating
(55%)
 
Starring: Julia Roberts | Jude Law | Natalie Portman | Clive Owen
Director: Mike Nichols
Studio: SONY PICTURES HOME ENTERTAINMENT
Run time: 100 mins
Genres: Audio Descriptive | Drama | Romance
Languages: English, English Audio Description
Dubbed: Spanish
Hearing-impaired: English
Subtitles: Arabic, Bulgarian, Croatian, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, Greek, Hebrew, Hindi, Icelandic, Norwegian, Portuguese, Romanian, Serbian, Slovenian, Spanish, Swedish, Turkish
Released: June 06, 2005

Are humans meant to mate for life - What drives someone in a perfectly good relationship to cheat and risk losing the one that they love and that loves them - Is it possible to love more than one person at the same time - How well does anyone really know the one that they love. Directed by Mike Nichols (THE GRADUATE, BIRDCAGE, WORKING GIRL), CLOSER questions the nature of relationships and fidelity as it follows the tangled web created by Dan (Jude Law), Alice (Natalie Portman), Anna (Julia Roberts), and Larry (Clive Owen). Dan, a British writer of obituaries, and Alice, a young American stripper, meet in the film's opening scene when a London cab runs her down. Cut to a year later: Dan and Alice are now a couple, but he is suddenly smitten with Anna, a beautiful American photographer. In an ironic twist of fate, Anna meets Larry, a British doctor, and they are soon a couple, despite Dan's continuing obsession. But the entanglements don't end there, and ultimately, someone is sure to get hurt. The four players do justice to a script that is humorous, raw and disarmingly honest about adult relationships.

Screenshots

Rating of 2 stars out of 5
Radio Times

Closer is adapted by Patrick Marber from his own achingly modish hit play and most of the time, for good or ill, it looks and sounds it. It follows a quartet of absurdly beautiful London urbanites (played by Julia Roberts, Jude Law, Natalie Portman and Clive Owen) as their love lives intertwine and they — either deliberately or accidentally — inflict emotional damage on each other. The performances are generally passable (with Owen the standout as the aggressive Larry), while Nichols's superficial but elegant direction and Stephen Goldblatt's glossy cinematography give the story a sheen of sophistication. But the decision not to open out the play for the screen leaves the film feeling oppressive, while the characterisations are, for the most part, paper thin. After the ninth screaming row, you begin to wonder who these people are and why we should care about them.

Rating of 1 stars out of 5
Halliwell's Film Guide

An occasionally insightful drama of adultery and hurtful jealousy among the young and privileged that worked better on stage than it does on film.

Highest rated reviews

82 out of 104 people found the following review helpful:

Rated 3.0 stars
Closer or Further? 3.5 Stars

N Stafford from England, 27th April, 2005

Closer is creepy and honest in the way your still-single chain smoking auntie is creepy and honest; with a cynical heart, and clipped words. Most of the movie revolving around the failure of relationships, the subsequent breakup, the arguments, the betrayals - like watching a year of Coronation street in fast forward. But it's not all that bad - there are some great scenes -- as when Clive Owen follows Julie Roberts around his apartment asking her piercing questions about her affair albeit with hypocritical abandon; watching Natalie Portman amazingly dynamic acting skills, and amazingly dynamic bodice; watching Owen breaking Jude Law's heart with unflinching, but warranted, menace; and others. Jude Law is a little Shakespearian bitch (you know - those guys who talk to their hearts) - and it's only possible to sympathise with him if you forget that he's the cause of his own woes. Julie Roberts, although a strong actor, mopes around this movie like a cardboard, trying too hard not to overtake the film and to understate her performance. This movie comes across as urban professional movie, almost an inverse creation of 'Love Actually' - 'No Love Actually'. Have you ever played 'The Sims' on the computer? I think if the Sims were a tad more aggressive and urban they'd all talk like this. But after all this - I still think it's worth watching - there are worse movies to be had, and I enjoyed watching their IKEA walls come crashing down.

Read all highest rated reviews

56 out of 79 people found the following review helpful:

Rated 1.0 stars
Nastiest film of the year?

A Customer from London, 4th March, 2005

I'm amazing this nasty, mean-spirited piece of work is so popular. The characters and acting are both empty and devoid of any redeeming features. Contrary to the opinion of the Oscar voters, the acting is dreadful with an instantly forgettable turn from Jude Law and if what Clive Owen is doing in this film is anything akin to acting then my Russell Grant might be the next Bond. He shows the same facial expression for happy as he does for angry/sad/faintly baffled/smelling a fart though perhaps his performance is too subtle for the likes of me. All in all a thoroughly depressing and, to my mind, unrealistic look at the state of modern relationships and not a patch on the stage version.

Read all highest rated reviews

38 out of 48 people found the following review helpful:

Rated 5.0 stars
Do you really want marriage?

Rearwheel from London, 27th April, 2006

I watched this with a friend and we were both captivated. The Guardian gave this one star out of five and I had avoided it for ages on this basis. Shame on The Guardian.

Dan (Jude Law) is with Alice (Natalie Portman) but falls for Anna (Julia Roberts) who marries Larry (Clive Owen). And at some point, Larry also falls for Alice. Eventually, everyone knows what the other has done. Everyone is a casualty, no-one leaves unscathed.

The film is supported by uncompromising dialogue, particularly from Alice and Larry whose characters seem more neurotic and needed to express themselves as crudely as they did. It really is a razor sharp script, allowing the characters depth, credibility and ultimately our affection. The performances by the four main protagonists were globally strong: Owen and Portman attract special attention, probably because their characters are so passionate, stubborn and prepared to go into free-fall, whilst the more effeminate Dan by Jude Law garners less sympathy but equal applause. Julia Roberts plays the professional who doesn’t end up calling the shots, winning the day or doing anything remotely “Hollywood”. Very refreshing, and played throughout with a cool incisiveness.

If you enjoy scripts where you suspect that the author has sweated over the selection of every word, and the actors truly deliver what they have been fed, then this will not disappoint.

Read all highest rated reviews

34 out of 34 people found the following review helpful:

Rated 0.0 stars
Insulting

BobbyShaftoe from , 7th March, 2009

This film takes place in that strange, Nescafe-advert, Richard Curtis parallel universe where everyone in London is either a writer or an artist and lives in a massively spacious 'apartment'. It also has lots of swearing, which I guess was an attempt by the film makers to assure the audience. and themselves, how 'authentic' this movie is compared to most rom-coms. But it's awful. It's about Julia Roberts, Natalie Portman, and charisma vacuums Clive Owen and Jude Law, and the oh-so vital issue of who of them should be sleeping with whom. For some reason we are expected to care. Not exactly an important universal theme we can all relate to is it? Screw them. Beautiful people and their beautiful problems are not top of my list of daily concerns, nor am I particularly interested in watching films about them. I once woke up in an unfamiliar garden with a kebab in my pocket and a hangover so vicious it could've worked for the Gestapo, and all things told, that was a more enjoyable experience than watching this film.

Read all highest rated reviews

Most recent reviews

Rated 2.0 stars
I think it missed the point.

A Customer from London, UK., 23rd February, 2010

Roberts and Law put in some truly wooden performances. Oddly, Clive Owen was the best of the main actors, which explains just how poor it was overall. I found the dialog simple to the point of irritation, in that it was almost entirely constructed of 3-5 word bursts shot back and forth between two characters. I guess it was a stylistic statement, but I think it missed the point.

Read all recent reviews

Rated 2.0 stars
Unlike the play

sandy666 from , 20th February, 2010

Very similar to the play, but somone has changed the ending which denies the whole piece a big emotional punch. Jude Law cannot act out of a paper bag in this one either. The dialoge is sharp and the characters unspmpathetic, however this worksbetter on the stage than on film.

Read all recent reviews

Rated 3.0 stars
Closer

A Customer from London, 15th February, 2010

Enjoyed this movie and in particular the acting by Clive Owen. Little bit Risque in parts but over all enjoyable. Peoples interconnecting Live, Lies and Love.

Read all recent reviews

Rated 1.0 stars
Does not translate from stage to screen

Gazmo from , 31st January, 2010

A good cast is let down by a poor script for the screen. It has a slow beginning, an angry middle, and an unbelievable ending. The film does not take advantage of being set in London. See this on stage but don't worry about renting the DVD.

Read all recent reviews