Skip over navigation

Sofa Cinema

Gifts - NEW  |   Help   |   Sign in

Kids (1995) Certificate 18

Kids
Play trailer

Sign up

Rated 3.0 stars
Average rating
(62%)
 
Starring: Leo Fitzpatrick | Justin Pierce | Chloe Sevigny | Rosario Dawson
Director: Larry Clark
Studio: MOMENTUM PICTURES
Run time: 93 mins
Genres: Drama
Languages: English
Released: (unknown)

A group of street-tough Manhattan teens fight, party, take drugs, have sex, and scoff at the consequences in this unflinching account of one day in their lives. Larry Clark's controversial, bleak portrait of societal decay originally garnered an NC-17 rating, which the filmmakers surrendered, opting instead to release the film unrated. KIDS features the screen debuts of Chloe Sevigny and Rosario Dawson.

Rating of 4 stars out of 5
Radio Times

Baby-faced teenager Leo Fitzpatrick here plays a self-styled “virgin surgeon”, who spends his days beating up street trash, getting drunk and stoned and deflowering very young girls. One of his conquests (Chloë Sevigny) tries to track him down to tell him he's HIV-positive while still dazed from her own diagnosis. Acerbically scripted by Harmony Korine and directed by influential underground photographer Larry Clark, this disturbingly explicit look at Generation X “skateboard culture” poses difficult questions and offers few easy answers. Clark's issue-raising treatise was deemed offensive exploitation by some sectors of society, but it is in fact highly moral and thought provoking.

Highest rated reviews

18 out of 18 people found the following review helpful:

Rated 5.0 stars
Good, Better, Best

PeterSays from , 30th May, 2007

I watched in the wrong order, which, it turns out, was probably best. I first saw Havoc (made in 2005), then Thriteen (2002), then finally Kids (1995). Each rips off its predecessor, each becoming more commercial. It's said that the original is generally the best and for these films, it's certainly true. Anne Hathaway's acting in Havoc seemed empty and posturing compared to Nikki Reed and Evan Rachel Wood in Thirteen; Thirteen played safe compared to Kids' boldness. For teenage tearaway flicks, Kids is the archetype, the mother load. It's no surprise that Kids inspired so many other film makers. It's raw and it's sophisticated. The intercut scenes of the boys and the girls talking about the opposite sex had something Shakespearian about it. Its focus on an immoral anti-hero and the film's lack of resolution, not falling back on the safety of the classic Hollywood narrative form, are refreshing: the makers of Kids treated their audience like adults. I don't know if I'd have been as positive about Havoc (3 stars) and Thirteen (4 stars) if I'd seen them in the right order. I may well have become increasingly infuriated at how Hollywood progressively commercialises and trivialises original creative ideas.

Read all highest rated reviews

11 out of 14 people found the following review helpful:

Rated 5.0 stars
Absolutely brilliant.

A Customer from watford, 6th June, 2004

Im a teenager and i think that this movie was awesome. If kids themselves would watch it they would understand the consept of aids and other sexual diseases. after watching this movie it made myself think about how much danger there really is out there. i just thought it was a good movie because it is pretty much how life is out on the streets these days. another thing is i have some friends that are just like the devirginater in this movie and it made me think that maybe he should get tested so that the people he has done s**t with will know whether or not they have stds.cause most people dont get it and it never clicks in their heads that they could be doing some damage to young girls by sleeping around. thanks

Read all highest rated reviews

10 out of 12 people found the following review helpful:

Rated 0.0 stars
nasty

A Customer from Beckenham, 17th March, 2008

this is a nasty spiteful little film with no redemaing features. it portrays teenagers as sex/drug/thug machines and gives us nothing to feel empathy towards. the director was obviously looking to shock, and this took up so much of his focus that he forgot to make a film in the process. dont waste your time with this.

Read all highest rated reviews

9 out of 11 people found the following review helpful:

Rated 1.0 stars
i dont kno

buriedinscars from from Bristol, 1st October, 2008

dint really watch to be honest

Read all highest rated reviews

Most recent reviews

*** May contain spoilers ***


Rated 5.0 stars
Refreshingly Simplistic

A Customer from Oxford, 27th November, 2009

The critics of Kids frown on the film's lack of character development. For me, this is what renders the film so powerful. There is no progression towards a greater, moral intelligence for these youths. They reach no understanding of themselves...or at least none of any consequence. Jennie may have been roused to her naivety but her urgency to act soon peters out to resignation. Resignation reigns over the characters, spurring them to cheap thrills to lighten the meritocracy of their existence. It would be wholly more pleasant to end this film with a sugary, dose of Hollywoodian resolve but that would be a distortion of the mirror image of society, Larry Clark was attempting to glare into the eyes of his viewer.

Read all recent reviews

Rated 3.0 stars
Not as good as I remember

Randomfilmbuff from , 23rd April, 2009

I watched this about 8 years ago and thought it was brilliant - which is why I rented it out again. However, although the ending was shocking and dealt with some serious issues which should be shown to teens today, there was a lot of rubbish street talk with no real purpose or decent dialogue. It is still worth a viewing just to show that HIV is not a gay disease....

Read all recent reviews

Rated 3.0 stars
!!!!!!!

Starbux from from London, 22nd April, 2009

Like it alot! Very different and interesting plot and characters!

Read all recent reviews

Rated 2.0 stars
Kids

A Customer from Essex, 18th January, 2009

Dare I say, this is the original Skins. It's gritty and possibly true to life, although a little far-fetched in places. You are forced to dislike all of the characters and sometimes feel that they deserve what they get. Or are they just victims of society? Your guess is as good as mine!

Read all recent reviews