Skip over navigation

Sofa Cinema

Gifts - NEW  |   Help   |   Sign in

Unforgiven (1992) Certificate 15

Unforgiven
Play trailer

Sign up

Rated 3.5 stars
Average rating
(74%)
 
Starring: Clint Eastwood | Gene Hackman | Morgan Freeman | Richard Harris
Director: Clint Eastwood
Studio: WARNER HOME VIDEO
Run time: 125 mins
Collections: 100 Wild Westerns | Best Picture Oscar Winners
Genres: Action/Adventure
Languages: English
Hearing-impaired: English
Subtitles: Arabic, English
Released: September 01, 1998

Dedicated to his mentors Sergio Leone and Don Siegel, Clint Eastwood's 1992 Oscar-winner examines the mythic violence of the Western, taking on the ghosts of his own star past. Disgusted by Sheriff Little Bill Daggett's decree that several ponies make up for a cowhand's slashing a whore's face, Big Whiskey prostitutes, led by fierce Strawberry Alice (Frances Fisher), take justice into their own hands and put a $1000 bounty on the lives of the perpetrators. Notorious outlaw-turned-hog farmer William Munny (Eastwood) is sought out by neophyte gunslinger the Schofield Kid (Jaimz Woolvett) to go with him to Big Whiskey and collect the bounty. While Munny insists, I ain't like that no more, he needs the bounty money for his children, and the two men convince Munny's clean-living comrade Ned Logan (Morgan Freeman) to join them in righting a wrong done to a woman. Little Bill (Oscar-winner Gene Hackman), however, has no intention of letting any bounty hunters impinge on his iron-clad authority. When pompous gunman English Bob (Richard Harris) arrives in Big Whiskey with pulp biographer W.W. Beauchamp (Saul Rubinek) in tow, Little Bill beats Bob senseless and promises to tell Beauchamp the real story about violent frontier life and justice. But when Munny, the true unwritten legend, comes to town, everyone soon learns a harsh lesson about the price of vindictive bloodshed and the malleability of ideas like justice. I don't deserve this, pleads Little Bill. Deserve's got nothin' to do with it, growls Munny, simultaneously summing up the insanity of western violence and the legacy of Eastwood's Man With No Name.~ Lucia Bozzola, All Movie Guide

Rating of 5 stars out of 5
Radio Times

Winner of four Oscars, including best picture and director, this is, quite simply, one of the finest films ever made in the genre. Exploring the harsh realities of frontier life, Clint Eastwood depicts the west as an unforgiving place where tragedy strikes every time somebody draws a gun. It's clear from the fevered manner in which Saul Rubinek's dime novelist character gathers his Wild West stories from the last eyewitnesses that an era is about to pass into legend. Screenwriter David Webb Peoples reinforces this shift in attitudes through the film's understated feminism and its assertion that what once passed for law and order often had little to do with justice. Eastwood's own world-weary performance as William Munny, a retired gunslinger forced to strap on the six-shooters one last time to feed his children, is exemplary, cleverly drawing on our familiarity with his “Man with No Name” persona to convey the magnitude of the disgust that he now feels at the prospect of killing. The support playing of Morgan Freeman as his former partner, Richard Harris as vain killer English Bob and Oscar-winning Gene Hackman as the vicious Sheriff Daggett is unsurpassable. It's easy to see why Eastwood dedicated the film to Sergio Leone and Don Siegel — this is both a testament and a riposte to his work with them. Gone is the efficient, detached bloodletting of Leone's Dollars trilogy and Siegel's Dirty Harry and in its place comes the greater emphasis on character and cause and effect that ranks Eastwood alongside his two mentors, at the same time redefining the genre. You won't forgive yourself if you miss it.

Rating of 4 stars out of 5
Halliwell's Film Guide

Harsh Western of revenge and needless slaughter that re-invents and revives the genre to spectacular effect.

Highest rated reviews

31 out of 38 people found the following review helpful:

Rated 3.0 stars
I'll have that thirty-two, Bob

JediSi from , 2nd September, 2007

Unforgiven is a good movie. Clint Eastwood did a tremendous job in acting and directing this film which had a great supporting cast as well. The story, just like real life, tells the story a man who has been out of the game for a few years and is making one last triumphant return to his old stompin' grounds. This film is unlike many other westerns in the fact that it doesn't glorify violence. Rather, it shows its dark side and the after effects that it has on people and their emotions. When Morgan Freeman cannot bear to shoot a man and when the Schofield Kid claims that he will never shoot another after he had killed his first. A brilliant performance from Hackman, and the pace and movement of the film were perfect for a western. Worth a watch but probably wouldn’t buy it.

Read all highest rated reviews

19 out of 26 people found the following review helpful:

Rated 3.0 stars
Grand opera, Western-style: maybe not as great as it would like to be

Rehan from , 16th September, 2004

Certainly this film underlines the coarse brutality of an age which is sometimes misrepresented as being Golden in American history. But at times it tries a little too hard: a black sidekick (who of course dies) with a Native American wife ... purlease.

In the end it just doesn't avoid a great many trite and sentimental clich?s: if that's what you want out of a Western (and it is, after all, what most people do) then this will be a rewarding choice; rather less so for those who expect it to seriously stand out from the average.

Read all highest rated reviews

15 out of 16 people found the following review helpful:

Rated 5.0 stars
A reminder of how great a star Clint Eastwood is

A Customer from Kidlington, Oxon, 15th September, 2003

Cliche Eastwood pulls off a dazzling reminder of his talent, in which he both directs memorably and acts in his usual Mona-Lisa-ish way. The film takes you through a moral obstacle course, by asking you to side with a reformed criminal who returns to crime on a two-wrongs-will-correct-the-prob lem mission against Gene Hackman, the corrupt mayor. While Hackman is masterful, Clint Eastwood remains the master. In my view the best western I have ever seen. And four Oscars suggest I'm not alone in my views

Read all highest rated reviews

8 out of 8 people found the following review helpful:

Rated 0.0 stars
Unbelievably boring.

CaptainBligh from from Wirral, 26th January, 2008

This must be the most overrated, boring, dreary western I've ever seen, and I've seen many westerns down my many years. I just don't know where the professional critics are coming from with their unbelievably over the top words of praise for it. Eastwood's performance was as wooden as the posts he ties his horses to. The storyline has no credibility whatsoever. What man, even a notorious gunslinger, would leave his children alone in the wilderness in order to go off and act as a knight in shining armour to avenge the disfiguring of a saloon girl (a prostitute)? It was absolute tripe. Even Morgan Freeman and the equally brilliant Gene Hackman couldn't rescue this claptrap. If anybody wants to watch a western that really does tick all the boxes and which is directed with pace, style, and above all with a sense of credibility then look no further than High Noon. But the DVD for this flick should really only be found in the one pound basket in those cheap backstreet shops amongst most other turkey's that Hollywood churns out for the home video market. In my humble opinion, it's that bad.

Read all highest rated reviews

Most recent reviews

Rated 4.0 stars
Eastwood Classic

A Customer from Wiltshire, 31st December, 2009

The story of a once feared outlaw of the west who has been changed by the woman he married, and the birth of his children. Many years later, after the death of his wife, he is encouraged to join a young ballsy, but ultimately naive young man on a bounty quest. He brings his conscience on the journey, in the character of his partner, played by Morgan Freeman, who is the moral balance of the film. It may sound like just another western, but the story is executed poignantly and thoughtfully. Unforgiven attempts to explore in greater depth some of the moral ambiguities of the Western genre, mainly through the meaning, consequences and moral burden of death. It is a theme more or less un-explored in the Western genre to such an extent. Though it only goes so far in it's exploration and comes up with very little more than to expose the idea that to kill, to take life, is not a great feeling of power or pride, but a recognition that life is precious, and that the taking of life is a burden to bare. Death and violence are obviously viewed negatively. Eastwood has pushed this exploration further than directors such as Leone, but this is a theme that runs through many films and few have surpassed this final point of exploration. Unforgiven is perhaps unique because, as I have said, it is unusual for this genre to explore it on such a level. I believe it could have been explored further, and for me it does not come to any new or profound conclusions outside of the genre. The film briefly and almost sheepishly addresses race issues. It brushes the theme aside in many respects, when it could have perhaps drawn more from the subject matter to support the overall theme of life and death and the moral ambiguities of the Western, to which it seems to point to so strongly. . It is, however, entertaining with a good story and is so classically a Clint Eastwood film. It is an intelligent and thoughtful Western, as are most Eastwood films. From an entertainment perspective it ticks all the boxes and is an interesting study of the Western genre and its development. Well worth the watch!

Read all recent reviews

Rated 3.0 stars
Non-exciting heroric movie

Shanlee from , 24th December, 2009

This is a typical Eastwood slow-paced old western cowboy style heroic story, with anti-hero character who starts as the loser(murderer) ending up as the hero. The movie is about three assassins who go on a journey to kill some guys who viciously assaulted a prostitute in order to collect a reward. Eastwood is trying to make a statement about the morality of gun play. Killing is a hell of a thing but it contradicts the movie. It was a morality play without morals. The highlight of the film was lots of gun slinging and Clint Eastwood's original cliché cowboy who killed the bad guys, got revenge for the partner and justice for the prostitutes. He is still a murderer after all that makes it 'Unforgiven'. The Unforgiven is eventually overwhelmed by Eastwood's unadorned narcissism. He knows well how to make himself looks cool. Watchable but not inspiring.

Read all recent reviews

Rated 5.0 stars
Eastwood says goodbye to the western in style

Duzzbob from , 21st December, 2009

A fantastic way for Clint Eastwood to say goodbye to the genre that made him a global superstar, and dedicated to his mentors Sergio Leone and Don Siegel. Unforgiven won best film and best Director for Eastwood. Forced out of retirement to make some money for his kids, an ageing Bill Munny does something he promised his deceased wife he'd never do again - kill. Unlike most westerns I've seen, Unforgiven does not glamorise the violence, instead Eastwood shows a human side to life as a cowboy and with his two partners unable to bring themselves to shoot anyone - Munny reluctantly starts to drink whiskey again....Also, Gene Hackman has never been better as Little Bill. Classic

Read all recent reviews

Rated 3.0 stars
Strong performances in average story

VIDEOMONSTER from , 19th September, 2009

This was one movie I had read alot of good press about. It was considered a genre buster. Having recently watched it for the first time, that view was probably warranted at the time. The central performances from Clint Eastwood as William Munny and Gene Hackman as Little Bill Daggett, are brilliant. However the story is hardly original. Morgan Freeman is woefully underused as is Richard Harris. The movies ending is brilliant granted but everything else is just average. Nonetheless an enjoyable enough watch.

Read all recent reviews