Skip over navigation

Sofa Cinema

Gifts - NEW  |   Help   |   Sign in

Terminator - Salvation (2009) Certificate 12

Terminator - Salvation
Play trailer

Sign up

Rated 3.5 stars
Average rating
(69%)
 
Starring: Christian Bale | Sam Worthington | Helena Bonham-Carter | Anton Yelchin | Bryce Dallas Howard | Moon Goodblood | Common | Jadagrace
Director: McG
Studio: SONY PICTURES HOME ENTERTAINMENT
Run time: 111 mins
Genres: Action/Adventure | Audio Descriptive | Sci-Fi/Fantasy | Thriller
Languages: English, English Audio Description
Subtitles: Hindi, Italian
Released: November 23, 2009

The year is 2018. Judgment Day has come and gone. At the behest of Skynet, an army of Terminators roams the wastelands killing or collecting humans. The only hope for the survival of humanity is Resistance fighter John Connor: a man whose destiny has always been intertwined with the fate of human existence. As the future of the world teeters on the brink of the future John has been warned about his whole life, something totally new shakes his belief that mankind stands a chance against the machines: the appearance of Marcus Wright (Sam Worthington), a man from the past whose last memory is of being on death row before awakening in this post-apocalyptic nightmare. In the face of an ever-adapting Skynet, John must decide whether Marcus can be trusted as he prepares to face the enemy head-on.

Screenshots

Variety

Darker, grimmer and more stylistically single-minded than its two relatively giddy predecessors, TERMINATOR SALVATION boasts the kind of singular vision that distinguished the James Cameron original, the full-throttle kinetics of SPEED and an old-fashioned regard for human (and humanoid) heroics

Rating of 2 stars out of 5
Time Out

Theres a chase scene half way through Terminator Salvation that rivals anything in the series. A breathlessly...

Highest rated reviews

210 out of 216 people found the following review helpful:

*** May contain spoilers ***


Rated 4.0 stars
'Terminator Salvation: The Future Begins

Spurs08 from from Amesbury, 4th August, 2008

Christian Bale plays John Connor this time around in the upcoming Terminator film. According to Warner Bros, the future has been altered slightly by the apperance of a new character, Marcus Wright (played by Sam Worthington), who is supposedly a de-commissioned Terminator. His last memory is of being on death row.
Connor (Bale), cannot decide whether this stranger has been sent from the future or rescued from the past, but as Skynet prepare their final onslaught to humankind, Connor and Wright both embark on a journey into the heart of their operations, where they find out a terrible secret that could lead to the entire annihilation of mankind.
Also stars Anton Yelchin as Kyle Reese, Bryce Dallas Howard as Kate Connor (John's wife) and Roland Kickinger as the prototype T-800 (the new Terminator).
Unfortunately there will be no Arnold Schwarzenegger this time round!!
It will be released in North America on the 22nd May 2009, so probably a late spring/early summer release for over here in the UK.
It's also been confirmed the Helena Bonham Carter will be taking part in a small cameo appearance in the film as a character called Serena.
It's going to be a stand alone film, abandoning the formula of the first trilogy (don't know how that will work though!).
It will be the beginning of a new trilogy of Terminator films, with Bale signing on as Connor for the next 2 sequels to Terminator Salvation: The Future Begins.
Sounds good, lets hope it actually is good.

Read all highest rated reviews

74 out of 79 people found the following review helpful:

Rated 3.0 stars
Not as bad as I was expecting, but nothing special!

JonoBrighton from , 14th April, 2009

It wasn't as bad as I expected. I was expecting it to be a pile of sh*t in all honesty.But to be fair, if it had been a stand alone film it would have been good, but as a terminator sequel, it didn't meet the mark. The action was pretty good but Bale was an awful John Connor. No personality or charisma. Nick Stahl from T3 had more charisma and a sense of humour for that. Bale was plain and wooden. The actor who played the young Kyle Reese was even worse. Far too jokey and immature. Sam Worthington was by far the best actor in no more than an average action film. It annoys me to be honest that they feel the need to keep sucking a series dry when it should have been finished in 1991. Not transfered into a movie that stinks off Transformers or Cloverfield (I only say that because of the motor bike things that came flying off the big machine in the film). By all accounts, two more Terminator films are being planned, but no matter how much money they throw at them, they will never be able to create a Terminator as menacing a Arnie in the first movie of the T-1000 in T2.
jonathan.mathew.hall@hotmail.co.uk

Read all highest rated reviews

42 out of 43 people found the following review helpful:

Rated 0.0 stars
Sub TV Pilot Dross

effinjamie from from Liverpool, 24th May, 2009

This film certainly follows in the steps of the previous movies, but unfortunately the 3rd fiasco and not Camerons classics. Simply put, McG is just not up to the task and instead of innovation or originality we get entire scenes from the previous movies 'Re-imagined', which can be good if done in a subtle way, unlike the way its done here, 'LOOK AT THE NODS!, LOOK AT THE HOMAGES!,......I'M F*****G McG!' The plot is so contrived and predictable, with a main character who wakes up in the future,'What year is it? Where am I? Who's the President?...AARRGGHH!!!' This is nothing more than a cash in to spawn sequels, and I for one won't be touching this franchise again until Cameron is back at the helm.

Read all highest rated reviews

19 out of 21 people found the following review helpful:

*** May contain spoilers ***


Rated 2.0 stars
Borinator: Ruination

Selfy from , 8th June, 2009

Nonsense. Sheer nonsense. I know questioning logic in a franchise that involves time travelling robots is a little rich, but any film or series should at least be consistent to its own internal logic. This ain't. Salvation is so riddled with plotholes and ludicrous logic that the moment you start analysing it it unravels...taking the entire three previous movies with it too. Okay. Opening scene. 2003. Murderer Marcus Wright signs a sheet while on death row to give his body to medical science, entrusting it to the care of a pointless Helena Bonham Carter. Shortly after, Judgement Day happens, humans becomes resistance fighters to stave off extinction, John Connor steps becomes a cult hero, yadda yadda yadda, fifteen years go by... Marcus Wright wanders a post apocalyptic landscape, wondering who he is and where he came from. In a shocking twist that anybody with half a brain, or eyes, knew was coming, turns out he's a Terminator! My gawd! But what kind? An infiltration unit! The perfect way to get a Terminator up close and personal to a target, befriend him, then kill him. And this advanced model is invented...BEFORE the T-800! Arnie, appearing in the film by way of a CGI cameo that looks like the dudes who did the FX from the end of The Mummy Returns did some moonlighting, is a brand new model at this point! Which raises the question...when time travel is eventually invented (T4 is set before any robots go back...) why don't they send Marcus back then, to befriend Sarah Connor, make nice, then do her in when she trusts him? That said...why do they need a death row inmate in 2003 to eventually become their sleeper agent? Surely, with all those humans they're rounding up, convert them into hybrids and send them back in time? An army of undetectable folks who could happily befriend any threats in the past until the time was right to strike? Instead of a giant musclebound hulk with a desert eagle? More glaring errors or crowning moments of dumb? Skynet has a hitlist - number one on it being Kyle Reese. Kill Kyle, change history. They've worked that out. Clever, those robots. So, when they capture Kyle Reese, and identify him, and the big robot hand plucks him out, it's game over right? Right? No, they take him hostage, against all reason and sense, apparently to draw out John Connor. Who was coming to Skynet HQ anyway. And by killing Kyle Reese, John Connor would cease to be. But no - that would mean there wouldn't be a pointless action scene in which John has to save Kyle. The robots seem to break programming because they know how a three act action movie structure works. Marcus' own self discovery of being a Terminator also seems to open up all the perks that brings: previously, we know he can handle himself in a fight, because he batters some wily rapists. Upon learning his true nature, he can punch a T-800 and send it flying, snap off robotic limbs etc. How comes those rapists earlier in the movie don't end up with caved in skulls or as mushy puddles? Other things that you really shouldn't be questioning start popping into your head, a sign that film's quite boring at times, for example: Skynet HQ in San Francisco. It's all machine factories and prison cells... and GIANT PRISTINE SKYSCRAPERS THAT ALL HAVE CARPETS, AIR CONDITIONING AND COMPUTER TERMINALS THAT ARE DESIGNED FOR HUMAN INTERFACE! Really? Why would Skynet go to the trouble to build a massive tower that may as well have 'RESISTANCE: BOMB HERE' written on the side, and THEN make it aesthetically pleasing and easy for all those who wish to try. Then there's just things that the film gets wrong and or doesn't pay off. Kyle Reese's mute, spider-sense having war child? Pointless, save for an unexplained early warning system where she freezes when danger's near (including a massive Harvester that, to be fair, they all should have heard creeping up. Because it's the size of a house.) Common's soldier who just lost his brother? Needless. Pregnant Kate Brewster? A set up for some shocking peril or heartrending tragedy? Nope. Doe eyed battlefield doctor who doesn't do much doctorin' till the closing scene. Those plot devices neat steady hands to crowbar in, you see... Plus...John Connor's a bit of a pillock. There's no sense that he's a knowledgeable leader, in fact the only real way he could have ever gotten such a cult following is to say 'Hey, it hasn't happened yet, but they're going to send robots back in time to try and kill me because I become some hot-stuff resistance leader. Can I be the hot-stuff resistance leader now, or will I have to do some twee Messianic radio broadcasts first? Okay, hand me the mic.' Another thing...Christian Bale forgot how to do Proper Acting (TM) this time around. Apparently barking like a heat-addled rottweiller is okay in the future. Every scene looks and feels like it could be the one during which he freaked out and shouted at the DP. Every single one. Marcus is a far more interesting character on paper, but in execution he's flat. His relationship with pilot Blair Williams is where the film's get's its heart (if you've seen the flick, you know how bad that pun is), but it isn't on screen long enough to care. Believe ot or not, I did enjoy the film. The look and cinematrography is fantastic, the various new Terminators all work and it really does look like a post apocalyptic future. The action scene with the Harvester and the moto-Terminators is tremendous. Anton Yelchin's Kyle Reese is fantastic, Moon Bloodgood's Blair deserves far more screen time, and Sam Worthingon does what he can to elevate a role that still stands out as being more interesting than John Connor despite bad writing and logic. Thing is, when the final credits roll - nothing's changed. The resistance wins the battle but Skynet goes on. Nobody's really learned anything. The film is just one big shrug. It's nowhere near as good as T2 or the original Terminator. It's not as good as the ending of T3. It's probably marginally better than the rest of T3. I'll buy it on DVD when it's cheap, but a classic it ain't.

Read all highest rated reviews

Most recent reviews

Rated 2.0 stars
terminator salvation

A Customer from Crewkerne, 19th March, 2010

it wasnt a bad film but it wasnt as good or on the same level as the other films abit dissapointed

Read all recent reviews

Rated 3.0 stars
nothing special

A Customer from London, 19th March, 2010

anyone who thinks this installment is the best will be dissapoined give me 1 and 2 anyday of the week it had breath taking special effects plot was ok but i struggled to keep up john connor is now a man who is fighting more terminators overall not a patch on no 2 wont rush out to rent it again

Read all recent reviews

Rated 3.0 stars
Terminator Salvation

A Customer from UK, 19th March, 2010

Competent and well executed (no pun intended) but fails to hit the high spots of the previous films. For the uninitiated, a confusing plot!

Read all recent reviews

Rated 3.0 stars
Terminator Salvation

SouthCoastFilmLover from , 16th March, 2010

Very enjoyable film - all you would expect from the Terminator series. Christian Bale was good and there was even a 'cameo' appearance for Arnie!

Read all recent reviews